An analysis of CNO’s debt and liabilities

Update:  If you read this article prior to 11:20pm EST, please re-read it.  I had a major data loss in the upload that I did not recognize and as a consequence the bulk of the article was deleted. 

I have been asked by several readers to assess the severity and impact of Conseco’s (CNO) debt.  I am much obliged to do so.  But let me forewarn all readers that assessing the debt of an insurance company is risky business (pun intended).  Insurance companies buy and sell risk and as a consequence virtually all of their policies expose them to future liability.

Let’s start simple. An insurance company receives payments from its clients for a service (life insurance, mortgage insurance, mortgages themselves) The actuaries at the insurance company determine based on probabilistic theories how much these services should cost.  If an insurance company just ‘sat’ on the money they collected in order to keep it safe in the event of massive payouts (let’s say invested soley in Treasury Bills), they couldn’t stay in business.  In order to compensate for their low rate of return on their collected revenue, their premiums for service would have to extraordinarily high and as a consequence they would price themselves out of business.  So instead, they invest this money, in a variety of ways not unlike an investment bank would.  Additionally, as most publically traded companies do, they have a certain amount of secured debt (true ‘debt’ . . think bonds).

Most of you didn’t need to read that paragraph, maybe some of you did.  But even if it was ‘below’ you, it serves as a good starting point to assess the debts or potential debts of an insurance company. 

Let’s boil down that basic paragraph to identify the sources of liabilities and debt that an insurance company is expected to have:  secured debt (true debt – bonds, notes), liability stemming from policies they have written, mortgages they hold and investments that are linked to ‘risky’ assets (such as mortgage securities).

Let’s take a look at CNO’s numbers:

Secured debt (direct corporate debt):  $1.2 billion dollars

Cash on hand:  $1.2 billion dollars. 

This is a very stable condition. 

The metric that is often used to determine a company’s ability to pay its debts is the interest coverage ratio which is 3:1 for CNO. (Which compares the net income (before taxes) with the annual interest expenses).  This is a very stable ratio for CNO.

Let’s next consider the amount of liability that CNO is exposed to due to their insurance contracts.  CNO has approximately $23 billion dollars of liability associated with their insurance contracts.  Theoretically, if all of these needed to be paid, CNO would be bankrupt.  But, of course, this is the same for every insurance company on the planet.  The key to an insurance company’s profitability lies in two key factors:  1. that their revenue exceeds the amount of benefits paid out each year.  2. that they invest their revenue wisely to ensure they maintain a large buffer to safety in unpredictable economic times.  

Let’s look at last quarter for CNO.  They received $1.069  billion dollars in revenue and paid out $1.027 billion dollars in insurance benefits.  This resulted in a pre-tax income of $42 million dollars.  After taxes, the net income was $24.5.  Divide this profit 184 million ways for each share and we get 13 cents profit per share.  Repeat this process quarter after quarter and you have a successful insurance company. 

At first glance, it appears as if the difference between payouts in benefits and revenue is slim.  It is.  For CNO, it is 4%.  Let’s compare that performance with a larger company that is currently trading near its book value. 

I selected Prudential (who looks like they will reject TARP funds).  In the same quarter (1st quarter of this year), Prudential earned $8.563 billion dollars in revenue and paid out $8.551 billion dollars in insurance payouts and benefits.  This resulted in a pre-tax income of $12 million dollars and then after taxes and some creative accounting net income of $5 million dollars attibutable to shareholders (they report an income of $14 milion but for a variety of reasons only $5 million dollars of that is attributable to shareholders) for an income of 1 cent per share.  Prudential’s margin here is .1% (compared to the 4% we calculated for CNO)

So after all the number crunching, I think it is clear that CNO’s financial structure regarding its insurance policies is sound and no different than the titans of the industry (and in the case of Prudential, arguably better)

Now there is the topic of exposure to the credit and mortgage ‘crisis’.  CNO is exposed to $2 billion dollars of mortgages and has close to $3 billion dollars of mortgage backed securities as investments.  To address the latter first, CNO has placed a ‘fair value’ on the $3 billion of investments at $2 billion to be conservative and as a result reducing their held assets by 5%.  As a side note, they did not have to do this, but it is clear to me that they are trying to protect themselves from future economic and credit hardships.

As far as their $3 billion dollars in mortgage loans, the company reported that as of 31 March 2009, the company had $7.6 million dollars in mortgage loans that were currently 90 days or more delinquent.  This is .2% of the value of their currently held loans, with the national foreclosure rate hovering around 2% (on the high side), it is clear that CNO is not likely to suffer from past poor lending practices.

There is much more analysis that could be done here (such as looking at their regional exposures and their debt structures) but I think the numbers presented speak for themselves here.  CNO’s debt and liability structure is healthy and although not without some risk, in-line or above the industry average.

Aimee and I are leaving to watch a performance of Mama Mia in Honolulu tonight.  Have a great weekend.

Don’t forget to subscribe to my blog to receive my newsletter, updates and weekly stock picks.  You can subscribe in the upper left hand corner of this screen.

Advertisement

5 Responses

  1. Nice write-up. I personally averaged in at 2.94/sh and am looking very long term on this. Hope you are right.

  2. I appreciate your thoughts on this topic and feel that you do a great job at remaining distant enough to logically determine the true value of the companies you talk about. We will see how it pans out in the long run.

    I on the other hand am both logical and emotional about this company. I work for Bankers Life and Casualty, a wholly owned subsidiary of Conseco. I am in the top 10% of this company, and recently returned from this years convention. I had the privilege to meet with both the CEO of Bankers life, as well as Jim Prieur, CEO of Conseco.

    My point in mentioning this is that I have complete faith in the leadership involved with CNO. Consider these facts: Bankers life comprised nearly 75% of CNO’s profit, and Bankers life has grown from a 4 billion dollar company in 2004 to a 10+ billion dollar company today. It grew over 10% in 2008, where most of the economic hardship was in full force.

    The first quarter for Bankers Life was another growth point as well.

    Lastly, I want to mention some history on CNO, back in 1998 CNO purchased a financial company called GreenTree Financial. This was a company involved in mortgages of mobile homes, and this company was the sole cause of Conseco’s bankruptcy.

    Basically, although at the time the bankruptcy was terrible for common share holders, it was almost like a glimpse into the future. Since that point, the leadership at Conseco have kept the vast majority of their assets AWAY from mortgage backed securities. For these reasons, CNO is positioned very well to endure and manner of continued economic hardship. This is mostly from my emotional attachment to the company.

    None of this information is insider of course, but I do not believe much of it has been mentioned. Hope this is interesting to you and whoever else reads it!

    • Jonathan, Thank you so much for taking the time to share those thoughts and experiences with us. I hope you continue to contribute here. I was actually very surprised to see just what a small percentage of CNO’s mortgages were currently delinquent (.2%) but your comments explain that very well – makes a lot of sense. Thanks again, Matt

      • I am curious Matt, do you believe that the decline over the past few trading days could have been influenced by the expiring May options contracts? I read elsewhere that the Market Makers for CNO options would make the most money if the stock closed near 2.50 on this third friday of may. Curious how close it ended up. Same thing for Google, which was at $390.

        Maybe I’m just getting paranoid but it certainly seems plausible that with low trading volume a market maker could influence the market to his advantage.

        I believe we may see a rise in CNO again now that the may options have expired. What are your thoughts on this?

      • Hi, Jonathan. I absolutely believe that the option expiration date created a downward pressure on CNO’s stock price. Absolutely. However, I don’t think that was the predominate force. CNO swung with the market and all things things considered I think it faired well. . . relatively speaking of course. I was watching the Level II quotes on CNO last week and the MM’s motives were actually making me very upset to watch. The pressure was on the buy side, NOT the sell side but he continued to sell off his shares as the stock price dropped. Standard fare, I suppose for stocks trading at less than $5 dollars but annoying nonetheless. I meant to grab some screen captures of exactly what I am referring to but didn’t. I’ll keep an eye out this week and if I see that type of MM activity again, I’ll post it here so I can show you what I am talking about. -Matt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.